Search for: "People v. Ward (1986)" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 9:53 am
Earlier this month, I cited Ian Millheiser on Wards Cove: In 1989, the Supreme Court in Wards Cove Packing v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 11:05 am by Kollias & Giese, P.C.
This opened a window for guardians of disabled people to at least continue pending litigation on behalf of the ward after they were appointed as guardians. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 6:25 pm by Russell Knight
Mentally disabled people, by definition, cannot swear to allegations under oath as they are not “of sound mind and body. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
Their Honours held that the defence should not be unduly restricted, and that even statements that are not central to the matter communicated may still be relevant and protected, as was the case in Adam v Ward. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 3:05 am
In the case (out of the Supreme Court of California), FRANCES T. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:39 pm
  Innumerable children have been born into [State of California],   innumerable young people . . . married into it; [and] innumerable old people . . . died out of it. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm by Emily Coward
A California appellate court will address this question in People v. [read post]