Search for: "People v. Ward (1998)" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
THE
20 Oct 2011, 10:45 am by CAPTAIN
The opinion is found at Wells v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:36 am
Co. v Rigo, 256 AD2d 769, 770 [1998]; Home Mut. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am by The Legal Blog
Union of India & Ors. 2006 (7) SCC 1, the expression "ordinary residence" as used in the Representation of People Act, 1950 fell for interpretation. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Evidence was given at the trial that the VPR would have been circulated to not more than 150 people. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
People's exhibit 1B, a 30–round detachable magazine, was attached to the gun when taken into the officer's custody. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am by familoo
The approach in law is that set out by Lord Steyn in Re S and in respect of the requirement for ‘compelling reasons’ the judgment in A v Ward must be regarded as per incuriam and should not be followed. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
In an April 27, 2010 post titled, `The Dog Grifters: Donna Roberts and Dawn Abrams Strike Again,’ defendant wondered how `these despicable human beings’ `think that they can continue to get away with ripping people off . . . [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:43 am by Matthew Flinn
By that time the Council had released further statistical information about the number of void properties broken down by ward. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:18 pm by David Fraser
“Over one thousand people have registered on our secure website to tell us how the breach affected them. [read post]