Search for: "People v. Warner-Lambert Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2006), cert. granted sub. nom Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:56 am
Even though yesterday's 4-4 decision can't be seen as entirely symbolic of the Court's orientation, the Court's ruling in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
Almost all of these updates have been compiled and crafted by our good friend and dedicated colleague Alberto Bellan, to whom the IPKat and Merpel raise their paws in a respectful and grateful salute.Don't forget: there's also a mini-summary at the bottom of the post that lists the features carried by this weblog over the previous month.Last week's substantive Katposts look like this:* Swiss claims: a Kat reflects on the Warner-Lambert v Actavis… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 9:03 am
The issue in this case, Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
Mark reports.* Looking back over this GreeKat shoulder… Part III: The “People’s Car” in the people’s dismayNikos reflects over the recent disgraces in which the poor Volks Wagen has been recently involved. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 74 [week ending on Sunday 29 November] – Bob Marley copyright | Nintendo TPM triumphs in Italy | GIs and TMs in the EU | Prebalin again | YouTube will defend fair use | End-of-year reading |Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd | Goodbye from Jeremy, and thank you from us | Greekat on plain packaging | Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media Ltd &… [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:34 pm
Pfizer Inc. and Warner-Lambert Co., LLC, No. 1819, Control Nos. 061293/061291, Slip op. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:14 am
Army Corps of Engineers was affirmed without opinion and Justice Kennedy recused, and then again in Dow Chemical Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Warner-Lambert Co., 122 Cal. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 4:48 pm
I noted all the commentary in the legal blogosphere over it, as Chief Justice Roberts stepped aside in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
The administration is supporting the manufacturer in that case, Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:21 am
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), aff'd by equally divided court, 552 U.S. 440 (2008). [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:32 am
Warner-Lambert Co., 424 F.3d 249, 254 (2d Cir. 2005) (“There may be instances where, because of the rigor of differential diagnosis performed, the expert’s training and experience, the type of illness or injury at issue, or some other … circumstance, a differential diagnosis is sufficient to support an expert’s opinion in support of both general and specific causation. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
To establish a false advertising claim, Pernod must prove the following under Warner-Lambert v Breathasure (2000), that:Bacardi made false or misleading statements as to his own product [or another's];there is actual deception or at least a tendency to deceive a substantial portion of the intended audience;the deception is material in that it is likely to influence purchasing decisions;the advertised goods travel in interstate commerce; andthere is a likelihood of… [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
Warner-Lambert Co., 326 F.3d 339, 347 (2d Cir. 2003); Thompson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
Warner-Lambert ultimately pled guilty to criminal violations of the FDCA for its off-label marketing and paid civil fines and criminal penalties totaling $430 million. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Some papers had reported that ligand PD-L2 binding generated a co-stimulatory signal whereas others reported PD-L1 was doing this. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
