Search for: "People v. Warren (1986)"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:46 am
In its landmark 1986 decision in Batson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Then, too, he was afraid people would read his work as a commentary on the Warren Court. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
Black and, on occasion, Earl Warren himself. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:55 am
By invoking a later Lochner-era case, Eisner v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
As you can guess from the title, Berger's book was very critical of the Warren Court (and its aftermath in the 70s). [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:35 am
” Maurer v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
” Kant may have believed that a system could be designed that would force even devils, as “rational actors,” to serve the public good, but few people agree. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Having said that, however, the time and effort expended to date are sunk costs.[12] Granted, many people are not very good at ignoring sunk costs.[13] Ignoring sunk costs, however, is precisely what rational decision makers – including the ALI – ought to do.[14] The basic problem with the proposed Restatement of the Law of Corporate Governance is that corporate law is not a suitable subject for being restated. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Just as Roe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
And these were people hellbent on killing and destroying people’s lives. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:44 am
North Carolina Supreme Court Finds a Batson Violation – For the First Time Since 1986 In a 4 to 3 ruling last week, the state high court in State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
These are apparently go-to accessories for people who don’t have skin. 5. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
Unlike any of my prior writings, the book is intended for a popular audience: people intrigued by how the Supreme Court decides cases as well as people who care deeply about the climate issue. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
In the 1986 case of Batson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm
Few people, particularly on the left, pine for the return of Bowers v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am
In his seminal law review article with Samuel Warren entitled “The Right to Privacy” and in his famous and farsighted dissent in the 1928 Supreme Court case of Olmstead v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:57 am
Nominated by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, he was selected to fill the seat of Justice William Rehnquist, who was simultaneously nominated to be chief justice to replace the retiring Warren Burger. [read post]
