Search for: "People v. Wells (1983)"
Results 41 - 60
of 996
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2007, 4:59 am
People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
In chapters on how juries and judges decide Section 1983 disputes, Schwartz shows that relatively few cases (under 7%) go to trial, adding that “federal juries. . .disproportionately exclude people of color, poor people, people with criminal records, and people who have had negative experiences with the police. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 12:55 pm
As noted in People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
Technology can empower very bad people as well as very good ones. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 3:39 pm
Prochilo and People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
That may well be true. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:14 pm
New posts at Section 1983 Blog, including one on Al-Kidd v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
In the '90s a million people bought that book. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 12:01 pm
Dart, October 23, 2021, Kendall, V.). [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 12:01 pm
Dart, October 23, 2021, Kendall, V.). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 9:02 pm
--David Hume, History of England v. 2, 64-5 (Liberty ed. 1983). [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Section 1983, as well as state-law claims. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Section 1983, as well as state-law claims. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
Louis v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
In both interviews, Dr O’Doherty was asked about the platforming of ‘people connected with paramilitaries on air’ and across local media. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Seal v United Kingdom (Application no. 50330/07) – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has rejected the claim of a man detained by the police for 9 days under mental health law. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
§1983 (“section 1983”),[4] and, for that matter, the Fourteenth Amendment’s “state action” requirement.[5] The Court framed the issue before it as a choice between two competing standards. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am
Summers v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:03 am
If you do, this case answers a question that few of us had even asked before.The case is Hines v. [read post]
