Search for: "People v. White (1981)"
Results 121 - 140
of 214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 11:49 am
This is the backdrop for Barker v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
But in Sherbert v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
See Spartan Steel v Martin & Co [1973] 1 QB 27, 37; Lamb v Camden London Borough Council [1981] 1 QB 625, 634, 636–637. 2 See A. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:25 pm
Lincoln, 80 A.D.2d 877, 436 N.Y.S.2d 782 (2nd Dept., 1981); People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:24 pm
Just as in People v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
Press 1981). [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:02 pm
Whether you hire black or white people to date each other on reality television, they argued, is not a creative, but purely a contractual, decision. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
One reason that, say, Justice O’Connor might have assumed that all black people and all white people live in different worlds growing up was that, for her when she was growing up, there was a lot more truth to that than there is today. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Preamble Since the announcements of the iPhone and Microsoft's Surface (both in 2007), an especially large number of people have asked me about multi-touch. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:06 pm
I'm thinking, for instance, of work on section 1981, like Robert J.Kaczorowski's "The Enforcement Provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1866: A Legislative History in Light of Runyon v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
A group of 14 employees initially filed a class action suit under Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act in October 2008 (Brown, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:10 am
A group of 14 employees initially filed a class action suit under Section 1981 in October 2008 (Brown v Yellow Transp, Inc, No 08 CV 5908). [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am
Lord Denning Jarvis v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am
White, 7 F.3d 527, 528-29 (6th Cir. 1993). [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:58 am
Casablanca and the law are black & white — using a third party’s name, image or likeness for commercial purposes is infringement. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
In Caminiti v. [read post]
