Search for: "People v. Williams (1973)" Results 61 - 80 of 209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
If you think of a “legal” doctrine as a rule according to which people adhere their behavior and pursuant to which parties can resolve disputes, executive privilege has not been a legal doctrine at all. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 4:01 pm by Dale Carpenter
As William Eskridge has written, "the modern regulatory state cut its teeth on gay people. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 pm by David Post
  On July 24, 1974 a unanimous Supreme Court ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes in (the aptly-named) US v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am by Josh Fensterbush
Two people subsequently we…Read More » Forest Park Animal Farm, E. coli O157:H7, Everett, WA 2011 Organism: E. coli O157:H7 Vehicle: Animal Contact An outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 occurred among visitors to the Forest Park Animal Farm in Everett, Washington. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
   If most of the people I write about are extremists, then postwar movement conservatism -- and perhaps conservatism per se -- are extremist. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
E. coliO157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4]  The E. coli bacterium is among the most… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]