Search for: "People v. Williams (1996)" Results 61 - 80 of 360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
William Funk (Lewis & Clark), Ofer Raban (U. of Oregon), and Kyu Ho Youm (U. of Oregon); and bloggers Prof. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
[xxiv] More than 11,000 people contributed over $150 million to the organization. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
But Barrett’s focus on the text of the 1996 amendments—as she put it, in “excruciating” detail—did not contend with the majority’s arguments that the new rule disproportionately burdened disabled people and virtually prohibited receipt of certain benefits explicitly made available by statute. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on William N. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm by Amy Howe
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a trailblazer who fought for gender equality as a lawyer and became a beloved hero of the progressive movement as a justice, died on Friday of complications from pancreatic cancer. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:00 pm by Robert L. Mues
 According to a study released on May 25, 2020 by the Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law at UCLA , same-sex weddings have generated $3.8 billion in local and state economic activity in the United States since the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage five years ago this month in Obergefell v. [read post]
It is important to also note that last week U.S Attorney General William Barr announced a parallel federal civil rights investigation into the death of Mr. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm by Lucas Guttentag
As Wisconsin Senator William Vilas said about the 1892 bill, “I think it ought not to be an authority which discriminates in the manner in which the word ‘immigration’ operates a discrimination. [read post]