Search for: "People v. Witt"
Results 181 - 200
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Witte; State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
One of those people, notably, was Barack Obama. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:45 pm
See Witte v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:43 pm
Also see Witte v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Under section 6(e) of the FRCP, certain people involved in a grand jury proceeding “must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury,” including the grand jurors themselves, the government attorney presenting the case to the grand jury, the court reporter and other technical people involved in the proceeding itself. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Trump had refused to criticize Russia on the campaign trail, praising President Vladimir V. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
Benjamin Wittes talked with Kate Klonick, Eugene Volkh, Jack Balkin and Quinta Jurecic about the executive order and what it means. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Invited to discuss her paper on Benjamin Wittes and Kate Klonick’s online daily show, “In Lieu of Fun,” Bazelon faced questions from Wittes on this conjecture: I love a piece that says that there might be a cost for treating free speech as we do in the U.S., Wittes noted, but is there any evidence that those countries with different free speech traditions really are handling the disinformation problem any better? [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
(For another, quite critical, review, see Ben Wittes.) [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 21, 2008 Witt v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:55 am
The current Supreme Court has a strong respect for the will of the people, and expressed that view rather emphatically in a decision last year (Schuette v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:14 am
For example, in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 5:14 pm
App. 2019); People v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
And on the merits, the military's highly inadequate Combatant Status Review Tribunals, which decide what suspects to incarcerate as "enemy combatants," do provide protections consistent with the Geneva Conventions and the Supreme Court's 2004 Hamdi v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
The LSE Media Blog has an article on recent findings of an evidence review on young people’s digital literacy, online resilience and wellbeing, conducted as part of research for the ySKILLS project. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am
The clashes have killed up to 80 people in Zabul province. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
As Quinta Jurecic and Benjamin Wittes have recently described, the McGahn saga and litigation has taken a somewhat tortuous path. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
