Search for: "People v. York" Results 1 - 20 of 13,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
But some are, as illustrated by the op-ed written by Columbia professor John McWhorter in the New York Times a few weeks ago, where he observed:Last Thursday, in the music humanities class I teach at Columbia University, two students were giving an in-class presentation on the composer John Cage. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
District Court for the Eastern District of New York found that allegations a drug company offered inducements “to physicians quite openly” cut against an inference of scienter.[17] The Central District of California, in Gharibian v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Voting RightsThe Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
In the case of the lift, however, ease of access for disabled people and other visitors is a compelling reason for making such provision in the manner proposed. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
.'”(here)Nonetheless, for the instigators, the benefit might well have been worth the price, at least according to analysis published in the New York Times in the wake of the action. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am by Bret Cahn
Kohler lacked capacity when she executed her advanced directives (Matter of Goldfein v Kohler, 221 AD3d 500 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am by Guest Author
  However, the case would give Justice Gorsuch a chance to more fully connect the federalism canon and MQD (as he began to do in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am by SHG
Nor may the prosecution use “prior convictions or proof of the prior commission of specific, criminal, vicious or immoral acts” other than to impeach the accused’s credibility (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 , 374 [ 1974]). [read post]