Search for: "People v. Young (1981)" Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2018, 5:15 pm by William Weinberg
The murder charge this woman faces is called a “Watson murder,” so named following a California Supreme Court decision in 1981 (People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
I've said some good things recently about good opinions and good people. [read post]
It is important to note from the outset that, pursuant to section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, reporting restrictions apply regarding the publication of certain facts surrounding R v Jogee, however, this does not extend to academic discussion or law reporting of the Court’s judgment. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:14 pm by Leslie Pardo
However, they concluded that despite clear underrepresentation of the young adults and older people as well as the economically and educationally disadvantaged that Maricopa County was largely fulfilling its obligation. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
When Ronal Reagan was inaugurated in January of 1981, we were about to finish up a 16 year bear market that had begin in 1966 and wouldn't end until 1982. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Young, 291 N.C. at 568, 231 S.E.2d at 581 (quotation marks, emphasis, and citation omitted); see Godinez v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:06 pm
With Sidney Poitier as the young Thurgood Marshall.The Magnificent Yankee (1950). [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Ephraim, 452 U.S. 61 (1981), and the ban on firing ranges that the Seventh Circuit struck down in Ezell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:49 pm by INFORRM
Her Majesty’s Attorney-General Claimant – and – (1) MGN Limited Defendants (2) News Group Newspapers Limited [2011] EWHC 2074 (Admin) The High Court has found that the Daily Mirror and The Sun were in breach of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (1981 Act) in relation to their reporting of the Jo Yeates murder case. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:16 am by admin
For example, see Greene v Watts (1962) 210 CA2d 103 (young child may not be capable of assumption of risk or contributory negligence in dog-bite case) or the ruling in People v Berry (1991) 1 CA4th 778 (a child under the age five is not legally capable of acting with reasonable care towards a dog). [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Cordell Parvin
Many young lawyers I meet only focus on relationships with people their own age. [read post]