Search for: "Perez v. Doe "
Results 61 - 80
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2017, 10:37 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:47 pm
The decision does two important things, in addition to denying marriage to same-sex couples in Puerto Rico. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:08 am
Last week in Perez v City of New York, 2007 NY Slip Op 05657, the First Department rejected this argument. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 8:42 am
In Perez v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:35 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:03 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
The case for these factors is Winston v Mediafore, 777 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 1985). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:12 pm
In Rachid v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 8:49 am
Supreme Court today, in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
NO-FAULT - NF-10'S IN DUPLICATE - 11 NYCRR § 65-3.8Prime Psychological Services, PC, a/a/o Raymond Perez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:35 pm
Saenz, president and general counsel of MALDEF, which led the fight in Plyler v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
While it may be argued that by appointing an arbitrator the order implicitly compels the parties to arbitration, the order does not explicitly grant Perez's motion to compel and does not explicitly compel the parties to arbitrate their dispute. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:12 am
It does. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 1:49 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 7:44 am
Retaliation does not exist if the decisionmaker does not know that you had asserted your rights in the At best, plaintiff speculated that her supervisor, Ortiz, knew about this, but all plaintiff has on this point is her sworn statement that another employee, Perez, told Ortiz about plaintiff's assistance on that lawsuit, and that Ortiz had Perez on "speed dial. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 7:13 pm
In Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
We hold today in Perez that section 74.451 was not a law enacted for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance and thus does not qualify for the MFA exemption from preemption. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:24 pm
Most of the orders were unremarkable: the Court granted, for example, requests to forgo a joint appendix in Perez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:46 am
The matter then came before Rolf Driver FM in the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia: Perez & Ors v Fernandez [2012] FMCA 2 (10 February 2012). [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
Torres-Perez. [read post]
