Search for: "Perez v. Paramount"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2011, 7:13 am
[36] The paramount principle to be derived from the authorities is that any discretionary exceptions to the usual costs rules must be made judicially: Bailey v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 3:14 am
Thus, it is evident from the record that counsel was trying to avoid the "overbooking of cases" (Pichardo-Garcia v Josephine's Spa Corp., 91 AD3d 413, 414 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Perez v New York City Hous. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:55 am
Perez et al., case number 3:16-cv-01476, in the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:23 pm
Paramount Pictures Corp., 137 F.3d 109, 114 n.3 (2d Cir. 1998). [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
For starters, there was the unique "direct to consumer" exception to the learned intermediary rule that the Supreme Court had adopted in Perez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
The case is Lawson v. [read post]
