Search for: "Perkins v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2017, 7:58 am
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
United States, 519U.S. 172, 183 n.7 (1997); United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 11:57 am
Perkins, 18 Ohio St.3d 193, 196, 480 N.E.2d 763 (1985), citing Nix v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 4:50 pm
Union Neighbors United Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
’ State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 1:44 pm
See Schleier, 515 U.S. at 331, 115 S.Ct. 2159; United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:09 am
A more recent decision on FRAND royalty calculation is Ericsson Inc v D-Link Sys., Inc 773 F. 3d 1201 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
United States, 585 F.3d 187 (U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 7:35 am
United States v Hill – United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit – March 21st, 2016 – In this case involving a bank robbery and money laundering, the Appellant appeals an order from the district court. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:19 am
United States, 466 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1972). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:30 am
Check out these cases for examples: Perkins v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
Perkins promptly called Agent Moore in Kansas, who was then advised by the Assistant United States Attorney handling the case to refrain from searching the computer and hard drive until consent or an additional warrant could be obtained. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
(citing Perkins v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 6:16 am
’ United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:25 am
Frank Perkins Hixon, Jr.Case number: 14-cv-00158 (United States District Court for the Western District of Texas)Case filed: February 20, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 20, 2015 5/29/2015 8/27/2015 2015-46 In the Matter of Larry C. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(People v Perkins, 62 AD3d 1160, 1161 [3d Dept] [affirming defendant's conviction for Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second and Third Degrees; "Penal Law article 265 does not effect a complete ban on handguns and is, therefore, not a severe restriction' improperly infringing upon defendant's Second Amendment rights. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:36 pm
" United States v. [read post]
