Search for: "Personalized User Model, LLP v. Google, Inc." Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2014, 3:48 am
… Google made the same argument that its ad and search services are unrelated in submissions to the European Court of Justice in Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González ... [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
E.g., from Hogan Lovells: “[I]f generative AI software has been fed or trained using private data (such as a proprietary provider or user database) the agreement should explicitly define ownership of such data. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am by Anubha Sinha
In its Business Review Letter, it notes that the IPXI Licensing Model is an efficient model which has the potential to benefit IP owners and users alike by providing lower transaction costs as well as by enabling a more efficient match up of licensees and licensors. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
 The claim against the first defendant, Google Inc, continues. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
It may not: Oracle won an important victory against Google when an U.S. appeals court decided Oracle could copyright parts of the Java programming language, which Google used to design its Android smartphone operating system - although use could still fall u [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
 * Personalised Medicines: a Presidential Initiative, inherent treatments, Mayo and Akamai  As President Obama announces significant investments to ‘pioneer a new model of patient-powered research’, Biotech Kat Suleman seizes the chance to revisit the topic of personalized medicine [on which he previously enlightened the readership here]. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:22 am by Sasha Romanosky
(See also actions against Google’s Beacon and NebuAD.) [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Companies like Google and other search operators are faced w/1000s of takedown requests to evaluate. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
A former council worker has been fined £850 for sharing personal information about schoolchildren and parents via Snapchat. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am by Rob Robinson
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
Evid. 901) - bit.ly/JLczYB (Gregory Joseph) Foreign Government Is Not a “Person” within 28 U.S.C. [read post]