Search for: "Persons for Free Speech v. U. S. Air Force" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2018, 3:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
He has not been politically active, perhaps because he was until recently a major in the Air Force. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:57 am by Zachary Spilman
This week at the AFCCA: The next scheduled oral argument at the Air Force CCA is on March 15, 2012. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Swanson, the conservative majority of the 8th Circuit held, en banc, that Minnesota’s campaign-finance disclosure requirements and contribution limitations both violated the First Amendment’s free speech protections. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
FCC, which upheld a statute that required cable systems to carry over-the-air broadcasters; and Rumsfeld v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  And is incoherently applied in the U of Ala. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am by David Kopel
 This is very different from Marzzarella, which found intermediate scrutiny appropriate in part because the serial number law “leaves a person free to possess any otherwise lawful firearm he chooses—so long as it bears its original serial number. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 Prohibiting a person from taking “any action to make . . . any public statement that the complaint is without factual basis” is a plain prior restraint on speech.[22]  Prohibiting that same person from “permit[ting] to be made any public statement that the complaint is without factual basis” only exacerbates the problem by imposing on the defendant an obligation to restrain speech by others. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Clemmons, the former director of operations for Ameristar Airways, Incorporated (Ameristar), filed a complaint with the Secretary of Labor alleging he was discharged in retaliation for reporting air safety issues to the Federal Aviation Administration. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Despite the Supreme Court's 1976 ruling in Gregg v. [read post]