Search for: "Peters v. Superior Court (People) (2000)"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
But, while the statute in the early 2000s set forth clear obligations and standards, it contained no enforcement mechanisms. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am
Dominion v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
In Williams v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
In Williams v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Supreme Court explained in Campbell v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:32 am
Atlantic Richfield Co. et al., Santa Clara Superior Court, case no. 1-00-CV-788657, filed Mar. 23, 2000. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:42 am
A: this is what courts do when they decide fair use. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
The Supreme Court of Canada finally upped Robinson’s total award from the $2.7 million figure set by the Quebec Court of Appeal, but without restoring it fully to the $5.2 million awarded by Superior Court Judge Claude Auclair in 2009. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
While dormant through much of the late 2000s, the government and content owners have begun a full court press aimed at preventing the free sharing of movies and music on the internet. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Byrnes, The Supreme Court [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Superior Court, 35 Cal. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
