Search for: "Peters v. The State Of Texas et al" Results 21 - 40 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2013, 4:51 am by David J. DePaolo
It was thought that everyone was on the same team, even though it was clear from disclosures and other communications that the lawyer hired by the carrier was the lawyer for the carrier.This assumption was, and is, erroneous.As reported this morning in WorkCompCentral news, a pair of state supreme court cases from Montana and Texas are making a distinction between counsel for the carrier, the administrator, and the employer.Texas Supreme Court's decision last June in In Re XL… [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's et. al., No. 08-10451 (5th Cir. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
Lenovo International, et. al. / No, DED Brigham and Women’s Hospital Inc. et al v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:20 pm by Matthew Bush
Ct.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition of Central Laborers' Pension Fund et al. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:33 pm by Cicely Wilson
Both the arresting officer and attorney stated that they were unaware of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Texas v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
See Jan Rigby, et al., “Can physical trauma cause breast cancer? [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Mud Buddy, LLC d/b/a Mud Buddy Manufacturing (Docket Report) District Court Utah: Post-motion correction of discovery deficiency warrants sanctions: CleanCut v Rug Doctor et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California answers: May an inventor previously employed by plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest serve as an expert for defendant? [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
(patents4life) (IPKat) Litigation rumours surface over Intellectual Ventures - Picture Frame Innovations, LLC v Eastman Kodak Company et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM) (IP Watchdog) (The Prior Art) CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney)   Global Global - General Nude trade marks,… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management… [read post]