Search for: "Peters v. The State of Texas" Results 101 - 120 of 630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In the former case, the Supreme Court had ruled that the state of Texas could refuse to put the Confederate flag on license plates because license plates are considered speech by the government. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:26 am by James Bickford
On Friday, the federal government filed a petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:31 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
And that happens tens of thousands of times per year.In the comic books, Peter Parker may have a "Spidey Sense" that lets him detect danger. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:07 pm by Peter Spiro
  Where the brief cites the 1941 decision in Hines v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Court Need Not Consider Disparities Between Federal, State Penalties When Sentencing Federal Defendant United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:57 pm by Jaya Ramji-Nogales
No one knows what the Supreme Court will do in Turner v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 8:40 pm by Guest Author
Las Vegas, 489 U.S. 538 (1989),and United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bingham of Ohio and the Historical Context of the Fourteenth Amendment" Cynthia Nicoletti (Assistant Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law) "The Disputed Constitutionality of the Emancipation Proclamation"11:00-12:30 | Panel TwoStephen Mihm (University of Georgia), chairPaul Kens (Professor of Political Science, Texas State University at San Marcos) "Big Business and the Reconstruction Amendments: Lessons from Munn v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am by Peter Tillers
One-Day Workshop on AI & Evidential Inference in Conjunction with ICAIL 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 10, 2011 Workshop Chairs: Giovanni Sartor & Peter Tillers Program Committee: Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor, Douglas Walton, & Peter Tillers For more information please contact either Giovanni Sartor - giovanni.sartor at gmail.com - or Peter Tillers - peter.tillers at gmail.com Panelists: Ronald J. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
Perez, two complex redistricting cases from Texas that are consolidated for an hour of argument. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:51 am by David J. DePaolo
It was thought that everyone was on the same team, even though it was clear from disclosures and other communications that the lawyer hired by the carrier was the lawyer for the carrier.This assumption was, and is, erroneous.As reported this morning in WorkCompCentral news, a pair of state supreme court cases from Montana and Texas are making a distinction between counsel for the carrier, the administrator, and the employer.Texas Supreme Court's decision last June in In Re XL… [read post]