Search for: "Peterson Holding Company" Results 21 - 40 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2008, 2:08 am
”  This observation holds true regardless of which religious zealot is desirous of imposing his set of beliefs upon his co-workers. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:00 pm by David Smyth
  The three used a British Virgin Islands entity called Asiasphere Holdings to purchase and hold their interest in the tower. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 5:09 am by Elena Chachko
Peterson (see Yishai Schwartz’s analysis here). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 11:48 am by Beth Graham
As the Ninth Circuit has held, subsequent California state-court decisions have undermined the holding in Ting. [read post]
13 May 2010, 9:49 am
That case was filed last year in state court, but is being put on hold while the company deals with bankruptcy issues. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Susan Schneider
In so holding, the court distinguished Wendinger v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:33 pm by Carolyn Moskowitz
State real estate laws, Peterson said in an interview, “do not have provisions authorizing financial institutions to use the name of a shell company,” in large part because “the point of these statutes is to provide a transparent, reliable record of actual — as opposed to nominal — land ownership. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:51 am by Amy Howe
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. [read post]
13 May 2010, 9:49 am by Jim Higgins
That case was filed last year in state court, but is being put on hold while the company deals with bankruptcy issues. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 5:19 am by SHG
On Patreon, Jacqueline Hart appears to be the censor holding the purse strings, but this is just another business decision. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
 The Fourth Circuit concluded that when a company has all of its physical operations for doing business in a given State and its four top officers in another, the “place of operations test” as described in Peterson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:31 am
Production of a mineral could be widely dispersed globally, but a particular entity (a holding company or a few competing companies located in a country where authorities have the power to force a coalition if it suits their geopolitical interest) may have ultimate control (including through subsidiaries) over the decisions of the top firms producing that mineral, even if they are in different countries. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:13 am by Simon Lester
To hold otherwise would negate the right of the NAFTA States to make reasonable distinctions based on valid policy and scientific reasons. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:41 pm
(The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Peterson v. [read post]