Search for: "Petite v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 28,969
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 11:30 am
Technically, the State Bar doesn't admit -- or refuse to admit -- anyone to the Bar. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am by JURIST Staff
In 1990, Asma Jahangir successfully represented Darshan Masih in a landmark case regarding bonded labor (Darshan Masih v the State, PLD 1990 SC 513). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Will Baude
I've benefited from much thoughtful commentary about last week's arguments in Trump v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:58 am by Amy Howe
” The justices granted two other petitions for review on Monday: Bouarfa v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm by Orin S. Kerr
As always, stay tuned.The post Cert Petition Filed in <i>United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Royal Canin and Purina now petition for review, arguing that the 8th Circuit “departed from uniform law in all other circuits,” which it says does not permit plaintiffs to amend their way out of federal court back into state court. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 8:55 am
Ross (468 U.S. 1) to overcome respondent Commissioner of Correction's special defense of procedural default; claim that, because decision in State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
In the petition for certiorari, U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent No. 10,845,044 B2 via IPR and Rotolight argued the petition should be discretionarily denied under the factors set forth in General Plastic Industries Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent No. 10,845,044 B2 via IPR and Rotolight argued the petition should be discretionarily denied under the factors set forth in General Plastic Industries Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:18 pm by Scott Bomboy
Back on March 12, 2024, Constitution Daily reported on the initial briefs in Trump v. [read post]