Search for: "Petition for Naturalization of B."
Results 1 - 20
of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2022, 7:14 pm
Our client is a naturalized US citizen and his mother came to the United States in July 2021 with a B-2 visa from the Philippines. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:22 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., to Department of Agriculture decisions holding that § 192(a) and (b) does not require a showing of injury to competition.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (6th Circuit)Petition for certiorari [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Petitioners alleged that the Respondent was guilty of "willful violation of the Education Law, General Municipal Law §805-a(1)(b) and Public Officers Law §105, and engaging in acts of willful misconduct in violation of the [school] district's code of ethics and policies concerning the confidential nature of the board's executive sessions. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:09 pm
CASE: I-130 (Petitions for Parent) and Adjustment of StatusCLIENT: IndianLOCATION: Frisco, TX Our client is a naturalized US citizen and her father came to the United States in May 2022 on a B-2 visa from India. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:45 pm
The petition of the day is: Pennsylvania v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 8:54 am
B. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 2:22 pm
Citizens (USCIS) History/Government Self Test (USCIS) The Citizenship Interview and Test (USCIS) Results of US Citizenship Examination (USCIS) Interpretations of Citizenship Laws and Court Decisions (USCIS) USCIS Policy Manual: Citizenship and Naturalization Natz: Exceptions and Accomodations (USCIS) Register for Selective Service Online Filing an I-130 Petition Abroad for a Petitioner in the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:01 am
Natural Resources Defense Council step two and Brand X powers can have retroactive effect. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:23 pm
If the State Attorney does not file a traverse or demurrer regarding said Petition pursuant to Rule 3.692 (b); and if the Court does not receive any evidence on any issue of fact necessary to the decision regarding the Petition, the Petition should be granted because there is no legal mechanism to do otherwise. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:23 pm
If the State Attorney does not file a traverse or demurrer regarding said Petition pursuant to Rule 3.692 (b); and if the Court does not receive any evidence on any issue of fact necessary to the decision regarding the Petition, the Petition should be granted because there is no legal mechanism to do otherwise. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:56 pm
According to INA §316(b) and 8 C.F.R. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 2:58 am
Our client is a naturalized US citizen and his mother came to the United States in May 2022 with a B-2 visa from Nigeria. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:26 am
“[T[he court…may…grant leave to the respondent to file a petition in the nature of a counter petition. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 5:22 am
Our client is a naturalized US citizen and his mother came to the United States in October 2022 on a B-2 visa. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 10:00 pm
Our client is a naturalized citizen and his father came in November 2023 with B-2 visitor’s visa. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:23 pm
Our client is a naturalized US citizen and his mother came to the United States in January 2023 with a B-2 visa from India. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Petitioners alleged that the Respondent was guilty of "willful violation of the Education Law, General Municipal Law §805-a(1)(b) and Public Officers Law §105, and engaging in acts of willful misconduct in violation of the [school] district's code of ethics and policies concerning the confidential nature of the board's executive sessions. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
At its Conference on October 10, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as specific personal jurisdiction over a nationwide conspiracy to manipulate the price of natural gas, proof of causation in a prosecution for insider trading, and the application of the Confrontation Clause to evidence introduced to establish eligibility for the death penalty. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am
Schmidt Docket: 08-1458 Issues: (1) Whether the Commerce and Due Process Clauses prohibit a state from imposing upon a shipper an ad valorem property tax on natural gas moving in interstate commerce while temporarily stored in an interstate pipeline system; and (2) whether a state violates the Commerce and Due Process Clauses when taxing natural gas temporarily stored in an interstate pipeline system by allocating ownership of the gas among various shippers without regard to either… [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 11:53 am
The petition acknowledges that no court has explicitly addressed the question, but argued nonetheless that the statute flatly prohibits district courts from "entertaining" suits after five years and that language like this has traditionally been construed as jurisdictional in nature and unwaivable. [read post]
