Search for: "Phillips v. Board of Educ."
Results 1 - 20
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2012, 5:25 am
PHILLIP C. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
” The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner sought the removal of the board member for displaying the Association's postcard and his "FYI" statement, contending that the member had "violated board policy and the prohibition on electoral advocacy described in Matter of Phillips v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
” The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner sought the removal of the board member for displaying the Association's postcard and his "FYI" statement, contending that the member had "violated board policy and the prohibition on electoral advocacy described in Matter of Phillips v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
March 28, 2013 Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP) (Upcoming note for Associations+) Just as with any other board of directors, directors of trade and profession associations generally owe duties of loyalty, care and skill to their organizations. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:30 am
April 8, 2013 Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP) (Upcoming note for Associations+) Just as with any other board of directors, directors of trade and profession associations generally owe duties of loyalty, care and skill to their organizations. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:14 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
"Phillips also challenged the penalty of termination imposed by the appointing authority, claiming that such a penalty constituted an abuse of discretion because "it is so disproportionate to the offense as to shock [the court’s] sense of fairness" – a violation of the so-called the Pell Doctrine [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:43 pm
The most recently decided of these cases is G.B. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
A board of education may use public resources to present objective, factual information to the voters concerning a vote or election (Matter of Phillips v Maurer, 67 NY2d 672, 673-674 [1986]; see Education Law §§ 1716, 2022; Appeal of Flippen, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,296; Appeal of Caswell, 48 id. 472, Decision No. 15,920). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
A board of education may use public resources to present objective, factual information to the voters concerning a vote or election (Matter of Phillips v Maurer, 67 NY2d 672, 673-674 [1986]; see Education Law §§ 1716, 2022; Appeal of Flippen, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,296; Appeal of Caswell, 48 id. 472, Decision No. 15,920). [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
* Here, said the court, there was substantial evidence in the record to support the determination that the individual was guilty of misconduct As to the penalty imposed but the appointing authority, dismissal, the Appellate Division, citing Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Peel County Board of Education, [1981] 2 SCR 21, 1981 CanLII 27 (SCC) MCINTYRE J. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
In Financial Oversight Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:03 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
The big losers were the "don't knows" -- a sure sign that this debate achieved its educational objective. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:19 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate On December 29, 2011, legislation to dissolve all redevelopment agencies became effective when the California Supreme Court released its opinion in California Redevelopment Association v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:50 pm
” This position finds strong support in one of the Supreme Court’s most famous First Amendment cases, West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:35 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Phillip Benson v. [read post]
