Search for: "Phillips v. Commissioner"
Results 41 - 60
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2022, 8:05 am
HiQ v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
The Mishcon de Reya blog also published an article on FoIs last week, explaining the recent decision of Moss v Kingston-on-Thames and The Information Commissioner NJ/2018/0007, in which the High Court held that failure to comply with a FoI notice is contempt of court. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:22 pm
Commissioners Wilson and Phillips disagreed with the majority’s position. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) issued a response to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport’s submission of draft data transfer mechanisms and procedures to Parliament. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:38 pm
The closest constitutional challenge to the PTAB was probably in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation David Erdos, writing for Inforrm in two parts, takes a first look at the Information Commissioner’s Office Draft Data Protection and Journalism Code. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Shelley v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
The hearings, "Protection from Persecution: Establishing Humanitarian Pathways for Hong Kongers and Uyghurs" is intended to be a "catalyst for passage of legislation offered in the 117th Congress to extend protections for Hong Kongers and Uyghurs facing a well-founded fear of persecution, including legislation offered by CECC Commissioners. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
Commissioners Wilson and Phillips disagreed with the majority’s position. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:55 am
The commissioner of the AFP, Reece Kershaw, has confirmed that Australian police used authorities under TO [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 10:37 pm
See Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Amicus brief from IP/Internet/Antitrust professors. * FTC opinions: majority by Commissioner Simons, concurrence by Commissioner Slaughter, dissent by Commissioner Phillips. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 1:30 pm
Both Commissioners also reference the Supreme Court’s recent decision in AMG Capital Mgmt., LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:29 am
Both Commissioners also reference the Supreme Court’s recent decision in AMG Capital Mgmt., LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
” The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner sought the removal of the board member for displaying the Association's postcard and his "FYI" statement, contending that the member had "violated board policy and the prohibition on electoral advocacy described in Matter of Phillips v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
” The Petitioner in this appeal to the Commissioner sought the removal of the board member for displaying the Association's postcard and his "FYI" statement, contending that the member had "violated board policy and the prohibition on electoral advocacy described in Matter of Phillips v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 4:20 pm
Curtis v Phillips (Civil Dispute) [2020] ACAT 115- a case concerning a Facebook post which made alleged defamatory comments against the claimant and how they conducted their cake making business. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
” (Mooppan referred to Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which rested on "religious hostility on the part of the State itself," and specifically on "the Commission's consideration of Phillips' case," which the Court held "was neither tolerant nor respectful of Phillips' religious beliefs. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
App. 2011); Phillips v. [read post]
