Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 701 - 720 of 1,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(Spicy IP) DIPP releases discussion paper on utility models (Spicy IP) Israel The USTR’s rite of Spring – Special 301 Report (America-Israel Patent Law) Mexico Forged alcohol beverages receive more than a hangover (IP tango) Netherlands Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) District Court of The Hague invalidates Fritsch’s patent relating to an… [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Christa Culver
Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.Docket: 10-778Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed the lower court’s dismissal at the pleading stage, based on the evidentiary state secrets privilege, of a suit seeking compensation for the petitioners' unlawful abduction, arbitrary detention, and torture.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition for the United States Brief in opposition for respondent Jeppesen… [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:51 am by Michael O'Brien
§ 601(g)–that he live in the United States for at least five years between the ages of 13 and 21. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:43 am by John L. Welch
There, the CAFC rejected the "reasonable manner" approach:Neither Phillips nor any other opinion of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, our predecessor court, or this court has endorsed the T.T.A.B. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by Peter Tillers
Together with Lothar Phillips he developed the concept of quantitative justice and fairness and its impact on decision systems, and on the idea of humanity. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
Although the European Court of Human Rights has held that the rule does not in itself violate Article 10 (Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 1 and 2) v United Kingdom (Apps Nos 3002/03 and 23676/03) [2009] EMLR 254), it is clear that it can have an onerous impact upon newspapers and other online publishers. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
This reflects the current law as stated in Chase v News Group Newspapers ([2002] EWCA Civ 1772). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm by Editor
iStock_000001063043Medium.jpg In immigration fraud prosecution, the FRE 106 rule of completeness is not violated by the partial admission of an asylum application that allegedly contained false signatures when the defendants could have sought introduction of the remainder of the application during the presentation of their case, in United States v. [read post]