Search for: "Pickering v. Pickering"
Results 1 - 20
of 593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Unfortunately for plaintiffs, Wells has been known to operate as a “cherry picker,” and his methodology has been previously reviewed in an unfavorable light. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:24 pm
Molly (x) 2020 Jane Lambert: all rights reservedJane Lambert Chancery Division, Intellectual Property List (James Pickering KC) Gibraltar (UK) Ltd and another v Viovet Ltd [2024] EWHC 777 (ch)"Comparative advertising" is defined by reg 2 (1) of The Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations 2008 (SI 2008 No 1276) as "advertising which in any way, either [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:33 am
It was accepted that the Patent was at least novel over Aichi as the latter related to a cherry-picker, rather than a telehandler (the difference being that the arm of a cherry picker can rotate). [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:15 am
LEXIS 110 , dealt with a strawberry picker who industrially injured her spine and left lower extremity. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
“Sundholm v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
Pickering (1968). [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:39 am
Cal.) in Johnson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:11 pm
" The Supreme Court first discussed this limitation in Pickering v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm
Hepatitis A outbreaks associated with fresh, frozen, and minimally processed produce, worldwide, from 1983 to 2016Year# CasesImplicated foodLocation of casesSource of implicated foodSuspected cause of contaminationReference198324Raspberries (frozen)ScotlandScotlandInfected pickers or packersReid et al., 1987[1]19875Raspberries (frozen)ScotlandTayside, ScotlandInfected pickers Ramsay and Upton, 1989[2]1988202Iceberg lettuceKentuckyUnknown, suspected to be from MexicoBelieved to… [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:58 pm
In applying [the] two-part Pickering v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Connick v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, the Circuit Court opined that Plaintiff's First Amendment claims fail because "under Pickering v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, the Circuit Court opined that Plaintiff's First Amendment claims fail because "under Pickering v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 7:33 am
Of course, it can be hard to craft a sustained narrative about those cases when many deal with relatively obscure statutes that the court rarely examines – such as the Quiet Title Act, the subject of this year’s less than momentous decision in Wilkins v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:25 am
From Mahmood v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:46 am
FEC, 572 U.S. 185 (2014), or the more deferential standard that applies to government employee speech under Pickering v. [read post]
