Search for: "Pickering v. State Bar" Results 41 - 60 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2024, 7:15 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The 1997 PDRS was in use, and it specifically stated that its MDT was intended as a guide only. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 5:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
Since this is a matter of public concern, the Court must apply a balancing test as set forth in Pickering v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:42 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘The courts universally hold that a law firm will not be allowed to drop a client in order to resolve a direct conflict of interest, thereby turning a present client into a former client,’ MTTP argued, citing multiple court decisions such as Picker Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
She also practiced law at Wilmer, Cutler, and Pickering. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 8:02 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The university also asks the court to apply the Pickering balance test for public employee speech and find in its favor. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Lee, an intellectual-property litigator and co- managing partner of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, said of Desmarais. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
In the case at bar, a review of the record reveals no proof that defendant American contracted for the work at issue or that it had any notice whatsoever that plaintiff was on its premises until after the accident. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
In the case at bar, a review of the record reveals no proof that defendant American contracted for the work at issue or that it had any notice whatsoever that plaintiff was on its premises until after the accident. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:14 pm
However, a couple of weekends ago in a crowded bar a friend quizzed her: “What is your ideal area of law to practice in? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm by Gene Quinn
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Regular readers of Short Circuit will remember that the Fifth Circuit made quite a stir when it held, in Jarkesy v. [read post]