Search for: "Pierce v. Superior Court" Results 121 - 140 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2017, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Just b/c patent act doesn’t mention respondeat superior doesn’t mean that respondeat superior doesn’t apply, etc. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
The first emerges from the development of a transnational private law of human rights torts that are increasingly recognized by European and possibly Canadian, courts.[10]  The second is a consequence of the governmentalization of the economic sphere and the resulting administrative functions of such organs. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:29 am by Schachtman
Borden Chemical Co., New Jersey Superior Court, Law Div. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
StemExpress has wanted California’s Superior Court in Los Angeles to restrain the Center for Medical Progress from disseminating undercover videos starring their executives. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm by Mark Ashton
The Superior Court held that was a misapplication of Publicker and remanded the matter for a better record. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:49 am by Douglas Reiser
The resultant legal tussle ended up in Pierce County Superior Court where the trial judge agreed with Vision. [read post]
18 May 2008, 1:27 am
ha ha ha guess what ill [sic] wear my f* *king piercings all day long and to school and you cant [sic] do s* *t about it.! [read post]