Search for: "Pines v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
” [Perotti v Pine Plains CSD, 218 AD2d 803, leave to appeal denied 88 NY2d 802]Terminating a school bus driver who used excessive force to deal with unruly students but who had just received a very positive work evaluation. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:29 am
”[29] The Court determined that the purpose of the “Service of Suit Clause” was to assure insurance policy holders that the underwriter defendants would be amenable to suit in the United States.[30] Because the clause at issue did not contain “mandatory language binding the parties to a particular forum,” the “submit to” jurisdiction language was insufficient to require that any litigation be brought in New York.[31] Although… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
” [Perotti v Pine Plains CSD, 218 AD2d 803, leave to appeal denied 88 NY2d 802]Terminating a school bus driver who used excessive force to deal with unruly students but who had just received a very positive work evaluation. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
Petitioners challenge a 2-1 panel decision issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, affirming a rule issued by the U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:22 pm
In simplest terms, Markle Interests LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
New York and Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:07 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 6:54 pm
United States, 444 F.3d 1379 (Fed.Cir. 2006) [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:07 pm
On April 28, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the District of Montana’s finding that the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:43 am
In the wake of Marshall’s capacious 1819 opinion in McCulloch v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:02 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 668 F. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:16 pm
Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that he was arrested, incarcerated, and criminally prosecuted for engaging in constitutionally protected free speech and was detained and arrested without probable cause in violation of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:56 am
United States, which involves the tariff classification of the seed of the Korean pine nut, Pinus koraiensis. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:50 am
(The Supreme Court in fact rejected a rule of personal liability for retaliation in Jones v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:02 am
” During the strike, the employer continued to operate using replacement workers, out-of-state employees, and managers. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Here’s a bit of history, mostly from my reading of United States v. [read post]
