Search for: "Pinkney v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2011, 9:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
United States, 597 F. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 12:54 pm
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Pinkney v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
” Pinkney v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
” Pinkney v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
All of the opinions in NFIB v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:03 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 12:38 pm
., McClain v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
United States, 121 U.S.App. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” . [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
