Search for: "Plaintiff A" Results 1 - 20 of 203,715
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:53 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Plaintiff and defendant previously contracted for defendant to represent plaintiff in claims related to an automobile accident. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” Had the Court decided otherwise, plaintiffs with pre-amendment claims could pursue retaliation claims and enhanced liquidated damages penalties with a six-year statute of limitations. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:00 pm by Adam Levitin
Consider how a bankruptcy court within the 6th Circuit has interpreted Dow Corning: Dow Corning held that this situation, which was in essence a proposed class-action settlement embedded into a reorganization plan, required that individual plaintiffs be entitled, consistent with Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to opt out of the settlement option and retain their rights to litigate their personal injury claims seeking to establish the full value of those claims, or risk… [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:23 pm by David Klein
Now, Georgia telemarketing plaintiffs can directly pursue the parties that stand to gain from the calls/texts, which are generally larger companies. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:00 pm by Guest Blogger
But Justices Thomas and Alito asked a series of questions about plaintiff’s argument that the Comstock Act operates as a de facto ban on mailing abortion-related items. [read post]
The plaintiffs in the original case, along with the State of Louisiana, responded by asking the Supreme Court to block the lower court’s ruling to prevent voter confusion in the upcoming election. [read post]
16 May 2024, 3:15 pm by Gal Gressel
 The district court ordered the plaintiff to arbitrate her individual and non-individual PAGA claims, and dismissed the matter. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Marian Goodman Gallery In October 2022, the Baldessari Estate (“the Estate”) filed suit in the Supreme Court of New York accusing Marian Goodman Gallery (the “Goodman Gallery”) of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of obligations under NYACAL Article 12, and breach of negligence and gross negligence.[13] The Estate is administered by Jab Art Enterprises, LLC, Annamarie Baldessari and Antonio Baldessari as Trustees of the John Baldessari Trust, Annamarie… [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:02 pm by Allan Blutstein
.) -- concluding that: (1) for portion of request concerning third parties, FBI properly used a Glomar response pursuant to Exemptions 6 and 7(C); (2) FBI performed adequate search for records pertaining to plaintiff’s investigation for fraud and extortion; (3) FBI properly relied on Exemption 3 to withhold grand jury records, pen register information, wiretap information, intelligence information, bank records, and export control enforcement information; and (4) government properly… [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:56 am by Jon Brodkin
Tesla previously won a significant ruling in the case when a different judge upheld the carmaker's arbitration agreement and ruled that four plaintiffs would have to go to arbitration. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:54 am by Josh Blackman
But that term also applies to judges who choose their plaintiffs. [read post]
This situation has drawn the attention of the government and we expect the plaintiffs’ bar to follow. [read post]
16 May 2024, 4:35 am by Jeremy Telman
Plaintiff took a voluntary dismissal in November, but nobody has covered the story, so I don't quite know what to make... [read post]
16 May 2024, 4:19 am
In the end, the trial court’s ordering of a new trial was reversed and the trial court was instructed to review the issues presented on remand only if the Plaintiff actually preserved the same. [read post]