Search for: "Pointer v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 327
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2016, 5:33 am by Eugene Volokh
The dogs aren’t, of course, accused of anything, even though the complaint begins: The defendants, approximately 64 dogs, are subject to seizure and forfeiture to the United States …. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
Pointer goes to . . . [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:16 pm by Rory Little
 The first question can be traced to some sloppy “law of the case” dictum in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 10:01 am by David Post
In Brady, the United States Supreme Court observed that “our system of the administration of justice suffers when any accused is treated unfairly. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Nothing in Title 17 of the United States Code even hints at that possibility. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Gotcher is an Investigator with the United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) in the Dallas Regional Office. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm by Schachtman
Women’s rights groups all over the United States applauded what I did. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:25 pm
But all public sidewalks near the courthouse are “traditional public fora” (see United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:06 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The failure to recognize this distinction is to fail to appreciate that Congress saw fit to create two different crimes, one more serious than the other, for two different types of offenders.About a year after Rodriguez’s conviction became final in district court, we decided United States v. [read post]