Search for: "Potts v. Potts" Results 81 - 100 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:34 am by Jason Shinn
This point recently played out in a lawsuit filed by a former employee based upon her race as well as a hostile work environment and retaliation (Potts v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:58 am by Brian A. Hall
” The Board followed the landmark decision in Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that in a multi-issue jury trial, it’s rare for an acquittal to ground issue estoppel.The issue facing the top court in R. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:17 am
Ltd. v Pott, Cassels and Williamson (1914) 31 RPC 104, is especially instructive. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
Paying heed to Lord Shaw's classic statement in Watson Laidlaw & Co v Pott Cassels & Williamson (1914) 31 RPC 104, at which he noted that "The restoration by way of compensation is therefore accomplished to a large extent by the exercise of sound imagination and the practice of the broad axe", the judge therefore set to swinging. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:26 pm by VMaryAbraham
v=RxPZh4AnWyk And there was Paul Potts as well: www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
The Times also published an essay by the winner of the Times/One Essex Court Law Awards, James Potts, a pupil at 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square: ‘Cameras in court: justice’s loss or gain? [read post]