Search for: "Potts v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:51 am
Potts v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 6:39 pm
Potts v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 6:25 am
Environmentalist groups hailed the Supreme Court’s decision in EPA v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:36 am
In Potts v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 pm
SBS Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
Potts and find that Ms. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
Potts complained, producing a photograph which was time- and date-stamped as evidence that he owned the copyright in the image. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am
The lease construed in Potts v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
Counsel states that because of the beneficiary's behavior, her firm performed services that far exceeded those typically required in estate administration. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:55 am
CARLA STRICKLAND v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:03 am
Potts, Student Intern. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:58 am
” The Board followed the landmark decision in Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
Court of Appeal then allowed the appeals and ordered a new trial, stating that it can’t be determined that the only rational explanation for their acquittals was that the jury decided that the Hells Angels wasn’t a criminal organization.In its ruling, the SCC referenced its previous decision in R. v. [read post]
