Search for: "Powe v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm by Mark Graber
  The chapter on state constitutionalism corresponds to The Federalist’s frequent invocation of “analog[ies] to your own state constitution. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:13 pm by (Ann Althouse)
The book’s endorsement of Lewis’s many national-consensus pronouncements is most egregious in the instance of the Warren Court’s 1961 decision in Mapp v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm by John Elwood
As Noreiga's reply brief states, "[t]he decision below affects the rights of hundreds of prisoners in United States' custody. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:51 pm by Hanibal Goitom
It declared [[t]he state of] Liberty is in accord with the law of reason, for all men share liberty on the basis of natural law. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:24 pm by Anthony Colleluori
Allow me to elaborate:In May of 2005, an Ivy-League educated physician (Rafiq Sabir aka "the Doctor,") was charged with agreeing to provide medical care to wounded "holy warriors" in Saudi Arabia, in an FBI sting United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
His situation was quite similar to that of Gaetano Territo (the Italian-American POW discussed above) except that crucially, Hamdi did not concede that he had been part of the enemy’s armed forces. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:41 am by Kevin Jon Heller
The most important decision, of course, is Public Committee v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Adam Klein
As the Court later explained in Baker v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
ABC News quotes University of Texas law professor Lucas Powe, who speculates that the Justices will likely opt not to attend the State of the Union address next year, while Robert Barnes, writing for the Washington Post, points out that each Justice chooses whether to attend the State of the Union address each year (this year, Justices Stevens, Scalia, and Thomas all skipped the speech).  [read post]
9 May 2015, 6:25 am by Sebastian Brady
On Tuesday, Wells linked to an en banc decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:14 am by Meg Kribble
Partisans captured in the field were to be shot immediately, not treated as POWs. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor's most quoted line in her 2004 plurality opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm
As our readers will recall, in Hamdan v. [read post]