Search for: "Powe v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2012, 12:51 pm by Hanibal Goitom
It declared [[t]he state of] Liberty is in accord with the law of reason, for all men share liberty on the basis of natural law. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:24 pm by Anthony Colleluori
Allow me to elaborate:In May of 2005, an Ivy-League educated physician (Rafiq Sabir aka "the Doctor,") was charged with agreeing to provide medical care to wounded "holy warriors" in Saudi Arabia, in an FBI sting United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
His situation was quite similar to that of Gaetano Territo (the Italian-American POW discussed above) except that crucially, Hamdi did not concede that he had been part of the enemy’s armed forces. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Adam Klein
As the Court later explained in Baker v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
ABC News quotes University of Texas law professor Lucas Powe, who speculates that the Justices will likely opt not to attend the State of the Union address next year, while Robert Barnes, writing for the Washington Post, points out that each Justice chooses whether to attend the State of the Union address each year (this year, Justices Stevens, Scalia, and Thomas all skipped the speech).  [read post]
9 May 2015, 6:25 am by Sebastian Brady
On Tuesday, Wells linked to an en banc decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:14 am by Meg Kribble
Partisans captured in the field were to be shot immediately, not treated as POWs. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor's most quoted line in her 2004 plurality opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm
As our readers will recall, in Hamdan v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Rumsfeld (2004) (allowing detention of a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant) and in Boumediene v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
This principle was established by the United States in one of the most dramatic of the post-World War II proceedings, United States v. [read post]