Search for: "Powe v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Powe, Jr. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Powe, Jr. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:25 am
This includes Bank of America v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
His situation was quite similar to that of Gaetano Territo (the Italian-American POW discussed above) except that crucially, Hamdi did not concede that he had been part of the enemy’s armed forces. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:37 am
[v] South Dakota: American indigenous peoples comprise 27 percent of the South Dakota prison population, the highest proportion of any state in the country. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 6:36 am
First, an important difference between a traditional armed conflict and the current one is that when the Germans were defeated, the POWs in the United States were thrilled to go home and posed no ongoing danger when released. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
To be sure, Bickel was more than willing to defend Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:07 am
Once we got down to business, I questioned him about Brown v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:51 pm
It declared [[t]he state of] Liberty is in accord with the law of reason, for all men share liberty on the basis of natural law. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 7:13 am
Hobbs; Miller v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:35 pm
-------------------*Here's Stevens, from Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir explaining how he concluded that the death penalty is now unconstitutional - a conclusion he stated in Baze v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
Pow! [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:41 am
The most important decision, of course, is Public Committee v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:21 pm
POWE, JR. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm
This law provides an exception to the general rule that the person who creates a work is the legal author of that work; according to copyright law in the United States, a work “made for hire” is legally owned by the employer, and not the employee. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:24 pm
” Pow- erOasis, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 9:19 am
Part IV addresses the far-reaching implications of Rasul v. [read post]
