Search for: "Powers v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. et al" Results 21 - 40 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
The anitrust case (Pacific  Bell Telephone, et al., v. linkLine Communications, et al., 07-512) is a test of the theory that a “prize squeeze” violates the Sherman Act. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS, INC., Defendant and Respondent. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Last week, in Federal Trade Commission v Actavis Inc. et Al., the US Supreme Court turned its attention to a fascinating crossroad of IP and competition law, reverse payment settlements. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Trailmaster Products, Inc., 625 A.2d 1005, 1014 (Md. 1993); Dentson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:58 pm by Dennis Crouch
See, GE’s brief, for example, 16-712 bsac General Electric Company; also, 16-712 bsac BSA The Software Alliance; 16-712 bsac Unified Patents Inc.; and 16-712 bsac SAP America, Inc., et al. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
  She also found that the companies had falsely promoted “light” and “low tar” cigarettes as healthier than regular cigarettes. [read post]