Search for: "Powers v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. et al" Results 61 - 80 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2009, 10:30 am
Willets Point United, Inc.; Institute for Justice; City of New York; Fifth Avenue Committee et al., amici curiae. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
  OpenAI published a paper in 2020, for example, outlining a scaling analysis for AI models, finding that “language modeling performance improves smoothly and predictably as we appropriately scale up model size, data, and compute”; see Kaplan, McCandlish, et. al, “Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models,” online at:  2001.08361.pdf (arxiv.org). [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am by Schachtman
These low event rates have caused power issues for clinical trialists, who have responded by turning to composite end points to capture more events. [read post]
  Particular areas of focus in the agencies’ request for information are the “purpose and scope of merger review[,] presumptions that certain transactions are anticompetitive[,] use of market definition in analyzing competitive effects[,] threats to potential and nascent competition[,] impact of monopsony power, including in labor markets[, and] unique characteristics of digital markets. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This paves the way for a low-cost alternative to a traditional proxy fight. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Becton, Dickinson and Co (case no. 2009-1008) (Patently-O) District Court N D Ohio: Amended pleading adding a new party relates back to the original filing date for purposes of first-to-file venue rule: Horton Archery LLC v American Hunting Innovations LLC et al (Docket Report) District Court M D Florida: ITC finding of noninfringement warrants summary judgement of noninfringement in parallel lawsuit: Solomon Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The bar is a low one and the background law is favorable to true federal officers but removal is by no means automatic and is often denied. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Both the Federal Circuit and the predecessor Court of Claims have deemed reasonable royalty awards to be “the preferred manner” of compensation under section 1498; in Tektronix Inc. v. [read post]