Search for: "Powers v. Nuclear Support Services, Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2013, 9:13 am
In Southern Alliance for Clean Energy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm
The Vermont Department of Public Service (DPS) and the New England Coalition (NEC) petition for review of a decision of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, Commission), issuing to Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 9:47 am
Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
Syndicate (Click here for details) Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
15 May 2013, 12:55 pm
Part 52 covering the licensing of commercial nuclear power reactors. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm
We fought back against the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's rubber stamp decision to allow radioactive waste at our nation's nuclear power plants to be stored for decades after they're shut down -- and we won. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
We fought back against the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's rubber stamp decision to allow radioactive waste at our nation's nuclear power plants to be stored for decades after they're shut down -- and we won. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
The Delaware Supreme Court’s May 8, 2014 Opinion in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am
Nothing We're Tracking Today (click for the complete Energy & EPA announcements) (c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:36 am
As the licensee for the power plant at issue, Entergy Operations signed a CBA with a union to provide security guard services. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am
Electric Power Supply Association, et al – Supreme Court Docket Electric Power Supply Asso. v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 8:49 am
Nothing We're Tracking Today (click for the complete Energy & EPA announcements) (c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
On this issue the Court did not accord HHS Chevron deference,[6] because Congress had conferred no rulemaking power upon the Department. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
Copyright owners send takedown notices, and service providers either remove the items or lose the safe harbor. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
<> Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Marys Cement Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:08 am
Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service Inc (BALCO). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:01 am
Does it matter whether the overlooked item is closely related to the other(s): for example, overlooking "v-necked t-shirts" in a list of 100 clothing items may be more readily excusable than overlooking "nuclear power plants" in an identification that lists only "chewing gum and nuclear power plants. [read post]
