Search for: "Powers v. Steele" Results 41 - 60 of 902
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Chastising finger wags, derogatory reports, and steel threats.] [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
We are not imagining what obstacles lie ahead if we were to “codify Roe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
In December 2022, the U.K. government also granted approval to operate a coal mine in Britain for the first time in 30 years, defending its decision on the basis that the mine would provide coking coal for the steel industry that would otherwise need to be imported (rather than provide coal for burning in power stations). [read post]
President Truman used the exigencies of the Korean War as justification to seize control of the steel industries during a strike in 1952, which the Supreme Court struck down in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:09 am by Don Asher
  Since some of our industrial worksites create even greater hazards for their workers, additional federal safety regulations have been enacted for these worksites:  Marine Terminals (1917 Subpart C); Longshoring (1918 Subpart G); General Construction- Electrical (1926 Subpart K); Concrete and Masonry Construction (1926 Subpart Q); Electric Power Transmission and Distribution (1926 Subpart V); Electrical (1910 Subpart S), Special Industries (1910 Subpart R), and Electric… [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Moore and Michalyn Steele Brigham Young University – J. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Supreme Court explained: Recognizing that the word “jurisdiction” has been used by courts, including this Court, to convey “many, too many, meanings,” Steel Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am by Christopher J. Walker
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Despite Truman’s argument that his position as commander-in-chief afforded him the power to make all military decisions, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled 6-3 in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
The more that people know about it, the less they support capital punishment.Last week National Public Radio (NPR) did a story that offered powerful new evidence of this fact. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Paul Pryzant and Matthew Simmons
Kodiak operates four business lines: (i) lumber and building materials which, depending on the location, may or may not include roof trusses; (ii) gypsum, which includes drywall and related supplies; (iii) construction supplies, which are primarily steel, rebar and structural steel, and (iv) kitchen interiors, such as kitchen appliances, flooring, cabinets and countertops. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 8:37 am by Samarth Desai
Justice Felix Frankfurter also believed Truman lacked the power to seize the steel mills. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by ernst
The American Journal of Legal History 62: 3 (September 2022) is now entirely available online:Class, Conservation, and the Police Power in the American Gilded Age: The Origins of Lawton v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 5:56 am by Rachel Margolis
” Figures provided by the organization Vía Campesina indicate that at least 7,000 people had been prosecuted in connection to their land rights activism by 2019. [read post]