Search for: "Practice Management Information v. American Medical"
Results 41 - 60
of 577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
After a long winter, the cherry trees are finally managing to blossom. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 5:38 am
Meetesh V. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm
Elizabeth’s Medical Center (SEMC) includes a clear message to health plans, health care providers, health care clearinghouses (Covered Entities) and their business associates to adequately secure and ensure that workforce members properly use internet applications and other systems used to share, access or maintain personally identifiable health information considered protected health information (PHI) in accordance with HIPAA. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
The truth is the email exchange very clearly shows the two were discussing debunking it by publishing medical information (i.e., rebutting the speech with speech). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:38 pm
For additional tips and information about managing these risks, see here. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:28 am
In Antone v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm
Under "New Jersey," we noted that the state’s supreme court had specifically approved the practice in Stempler v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:30 pm
UMMC’s breach notification disclosed that UMMC’s privacy officer had discovered a password-protected laptop containing ePHI of thousands of UMMC patients missing from UMMC’s Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU). [read post]
21 May 2013, 3:00 am
Smith, Joseph V. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
Employers should move quickly to review and update as necessary their human resources and employee benefit policies and practices concerning when same-sex partners of employees are treated as the spouses of the employees in light of the United States Supreme Court’s June 26, 2015 Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
While many businesses as well as individual Americans have held off taking long overdue steps to comply with ACA’s mandates pending the Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
To address these concerns, Congress passed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) to prohibit health insurers and employers from using genetic information when making insurance eligibility and employment decisions. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
The EEOC says Magnolia’s prohibited discriminatory practices included only offering positions to certain applicants under the condition that the applicants pass a medical examination, as well as discharging or revoking job offers when it learned of or received records of prior medical conditions or current medical restrictions. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:15 pm
., a partner in Labor and Employment at Fox Rothschild, spoke to a packed house at the 2015 American College or Laboratory Animal Medicine (“ACLAM”) Forum titled “Update your Skill Set: Leadership & Management, Preclinical Models & Occupational Health,” held in New Orleans, LA, from May 3-6, 2015. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
As part of our commitment to educating ordinary Americans about their legal rights, Justia provides Justia Legal Guides. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Special care and scrutiny should be applied if the group health plan uses multiple service providers to help administer benefits (such as one third-party administrator for major medical coverage, a separate pharmacy benefit manager, and a separate managed behavioral health organization). [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:00 am
Vanessa Absher, Lynda Mitchell and United States of America v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
The framework outlines a set of practices to encourage appropriate handling of personal health information as it flows to and from PHRs. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
See California v. [read post]
