Search for: "Prentice v. PERS"
Results 21 - 22
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Consider, for instance, how the orthodoxy infiltrated the ostensibly neutral Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, which proclaimed the multiplicative synergy of smoking and asbestos in its second edition: “Occupational asbestos exposure in nonsmokers increases the risk of lung cancer by a factor of about five, from about 11 per 100,000, for nonsmoking industrial workers not exposed to asbestos to about 58 per 100,000 for nonsmoking asbestos workers; a significant smoking… [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am
The Board also set forth (point 5.4) that, on the basis of the minutes of the oral proceedings in examination, it was at least implicit during the oral proceedings, and should have been known to the applicant, that both D1 and D2 were considered as "closest prior art".V. [read post]
