Search for: "Price v. Williams*" Results 21 - 40 of 144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2015, 3:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ct. 831, 836(2015).AAs to 112 P6:But this flexibility in claim draftingcomes at a price. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A cause of action alleging professional malpractice against an accountant accrues upon the client’s receipt of the accountant’s work product (see Williamson v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 NY3d 1, 8; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541; CRC Litig. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 6:58 am by CMS
It was the option that entitled the employee to acquire shares at a price that might be less than their market value. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 6:57 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Liberty and Justice for Y'all informs us of a potentially important and disappointing (sharply divided) decision in Brooks v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:38 am by CMS
It was the option that entitled the employee to acquire shares at a price that might be less than their market value. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
More specifically, the cause of action “accrues upon the client’s receipt of the accountant’s work product since this is the point that a client reasonably relies on the accountant’s skill and advice” (id. at 8, quoting Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]). [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
Fisher-Price, Inc., 485 F.3d 1157 (Fed. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:45 am by Brian Price
Los 13 abogados en DLP están representando a los Trabajadores del gas natural, trabajadores de la construcción del gasoducto y víctimas de accidentes de camión de gas en toda la región de PENNSYLVANIA MARCELLUS SHALE. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:01 am by randywallace
Schneider claims to apply a health economics methodology to determine a weighted average of healthcare prices actually transacted in the market. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
More specifically, the cause of action “accrues upon the client’s receipt of the accountant’s work product since this is the point that a client reasonably relies on the accountant’s skill and advice” (id. at 8, quoting Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]). [read post]