Search for: "Pritchard v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 11:28 pm
Brewer & Pritchard, P.C., 73 S.W.3d 193, 200 (Tex. 2002)); see also Shands v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
In Central Bank of Denver v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:50 am
In D&D Drilling & Exploration, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:50 am
In D&D Drilling & Exploration, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm
See Pritchard v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:35 am
See Frugard v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 5:22 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:37 am
In Houseman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:54 am
As the Supreme Court said in Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Shane Long v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:48 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
Weil V. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm
Corcoran and Pritchard v Van Nes. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
