Search for: "Pro-Inspect Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a case involving the invocation of inspection rights to investigate the reasons why the board of directors of Axcelis did not accept the resignation of three directors who failed to receive majority support from shareholders voting in the eleciton. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Ben Bruner
Pro-Build Holdings, Inc. and United Building Centers (December 2014), the Iowa Supreme Court declined to allow a lender (which took a condominium property back via a deed in lieu of foreclosure) the right to bring a claim for breach of implied warranty of workmanlike construction, which is typically available to other homebuyers and owners of newly constructed buildings. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Sahara Enterprises, Inc. by holding that a shareholder is not required to provide a reason behind a stated need for a valuation to assert the inspection right. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:30 am by Arina Shulga
So, a Delaware private corporation with business in California may find itself subject to pro-shareholder corporate governance laws of the state of California. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:13 am by Jonan Pilet
  In an Aug. 30, 2023, warning letter, the FDA described a Dec. 21, 2022, through Feb. 17, 2023 inspection of ByHeart, Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Justia, Inc.): Plaintiff seems to believe the New Jersey [appellate] opinion is his personal property…. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Indus., Inc.,998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir. 1993)). [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm by Coral Beach
Formula types recalled in relation to the outbreak are Similac Sensitive, Similac Pro-total Comfort, Similac Advance, and Similac PM 60/40. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:07 am by Robert Elliott, J.D.
As whole sectors of the economy see pro-active inspections disappear then that deterrent and advisory impact is lost,” he said. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 6:34 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Pro Skin Solutions was inspected by OSHA's Tampa Area Office, located at 5807 Breckenridge Parkway, Suite A, Tampa, Fla. 33610; telephone 813-626-1177. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 2:48 am by Jon Gelman
”EPA recently reached settlements in the following lead paint RRP cases:East Coast Pros LLC, Norwalk, Conn. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 3:44 pm by Bill Marler
” FDA Form 483 (Inspectional Observations) for Dixie Dew Products, Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nunc pro tunc comes up:Gore argues that our case law preventssuch a retroactive agreement—but for support ofthis proposition, all Gore cites is precedent in which weconsidered agreements that were executed after the suitwas filed, such as Mars, Inc. v. [read post]