Search for: "Professional Technical Services, Inc. v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 pm
I highly favour the role of an “IP coordinator,” and I am pleased that the United States went in this direction. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Laurel Terry, Professor, Penn State Dickinson School of Law, The EU's Professional Services Competition Initiative: Is the EU Very Far Behind Australia and the UK With Respect to Publicly Traded Law Firms? [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
YOU SHOULD CONSULT THE FULL OPINION, AVAILABLE ON WESTLAW.]Slip Copy, 2010 WL 520564 (N.D.Iowa)United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Justice Scalia expressed his view forcefully in a dissent in the 2001 case of United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Bush advanced the rights of a large segment of the citizens of the United States of America. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 2:57 pm
United States, Dkt. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
Plan administrators will need to comply with these technical requirements, some of which may change as the rules evolve toward finalization, in order to take full advantage of the new rules. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 11:16 am
Phillips, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
R.R., Inc., No. 07-2512 (6th Cir. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert, the Federal Judicial Center assumed responsibility for producing science and statistics tutorials to help judges grapple with technical issues in their cases. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
App. 2006); United States v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Universal Health Services, 974 P.2d 1158, 1159-60 (Nev. 1999); Packard v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Dyson, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
Amtrust Financial Services Inc. in the U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
See Duane Reade, Inc., 342 NLRB 1016, 1017 (2004). [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
” Freeding-Skokie Roll-Off Service, Inc. v. [read post]
