Search for: "Progressive Lighting, Inc. v. Historic Designs, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2009, 10:55 am
In my recent paper, currently in the submission process, Treasury Inc.: How the Bailout Reshapes Corporate Theory and Practice, I explore the implications of the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Below, we describe both the original study and the update we undertook and their results, in light of which we then identify four of the biggest myths that continue to surround biotech securities cases and explain why each is unfounded. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm by David M. McLain
"22 The Act was not intended to apply to errors and omissions coverage written on a "claims made" basis for persons such as design professionals.The first part also addresses an insurer’s duty to defend a construction professional against a property owner’s notice of claim served under CDARA. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  John Ely cast his representation-reinforcement theory partly as a defense of Warren Court liberalism, though he rejected Roe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am by Schachtman
Third, some of what Hill said is distorted in commentary, such as Richards’, by ignorance, or by design. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
 But legal academics have spent thirty years disagreeing with that proposition and dreaming up liability schemes designed to force software vendors to shoulder some of the costs long borne entirely by users. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am by Gene Takagi
President & Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) (holding that state common law torts were something that was subject to preemption), Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
The sum total of these Amendments would serve to maintain a private enforcement regime—necessary in light of governmental lethargy in this area—while simultaneously preventing the abuse that has allegedly occurred. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
The Court has read the §101 term "manufacture" in accordance with dictionary definitions, see Chakrabarty, supra, at 308 (citing American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. [read post]