Search for: "Progressive v. Emergency Physicians" Results 21 - 40 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2022, 7:36 am by Jeff Welty
The safe harbor applies only to abortions performed by licensed physicians and only to abortions performed during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy or because of a medical emergency. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:29 am by David DePaolo
"Based on a 2013 decision from the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals titled Truitt v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 12:18 pm by Frank Pasquale
Many of these households also assume that, given EMTALA, they can still get care in case of emergencies. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 5:53 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Defined as such, health care has become one of the key emerging use cases for big data. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:34 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Under that policy, a nursing home’s licensed health care professionals can, acting as an authorized agent of a physician, transcribe the physician’s oral prescription for schedule III, IV or V medications to a pharmacy for dispensing. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 2:52 am
This fact pattern was drawn, not from a client question, but from the recent case of Serrano v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 6:51 pm by Schachtman
Hosp., 262 Mich.App. 518, 687 N.W.2d 143 (Mich.App. 2004) (affirming summary judgment for hospital and physicians when patient could not greater than 50% probability of obtaining a better result had emergency physician administered t-PA within three hours of stroke symptoms); Merriam v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, reinforced the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), urging that physicians “must” provide an abortion, regardless of state law, if the physician deems it necessary to stabilize an emergency medical condition. [read post]