Search for: "Protect Our Communities Found. v. Jewell" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am by Bob Ambrogi
We took the unprecedented step of building the first alternative fee focused community of law firms globally. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:55 am by Patrick C. Toomey
The protection is a mirage, and it’s baldly misleading to claim that it has provided meaningful protection against FBI abuses. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
’”[7] While it is true that we can take actions in the public interest and for the protection of investors, those actions need to relate to our core mission. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:39 am by Matthew Guariglia
The actual documentary evidence also helped us to better pinpoint our demands, our questions, and our legal tools. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:17 pm by Aaron Moss
“[W]hy sign a label deal and not own all of our masters and publishing? [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm by Cindy Cohn
Supreme Court slammed the courthouse door on our flagship NSA surveillance lawsuit, Jewel v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
This is founded on the twin premises that, first, narrative produces multi-sourced nomos within a domestic legal order, and second, that international law produces a distinct plane of narrative with its nomos. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
6 May 2021, 11:25 am by Cindy Cohn
This is itself a constitutional violation, as we have long argued in our Jewel v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Customs and Border Protection agents in border communities. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
If you want a survey course, go to a community college. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The network was found to have breached broadcast standards with the “highly offensive” segment and the federal court approved a settlement between members of the Yirrkala Aboriginal Community and the television network, after members of the community sued for defamation, breach of privacy, breach of confidence, race discrimination and breach of Australian consumer law. [read post]