Search for: "Providence Health & Services, Appellant V. Department Of Health, Respondent" Results 21 - 40 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2021, 7:23 pm
👈An Albany Law School professor said toll.A sitting New York Supreme Court justice opined suspension in a law journal article.A New York Court of Claim judge ruled toll in a February 2021 decision.And now, the Appellate Division, Second Department, has, in the context of ruling on a respondent's motion to dismiss an appellant's appeal as untimely taken, ruled TOLL (and nicely explained the difference between a "toll" and a… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:23 pm
👈An Albany Law School professor said toll.A sitting New York Supreme Court justice opined suspension in a law journal article.A New York Court of Claim judge ruled toll in a February 2021 decision.And now, the Appellate Division, Second Department, has, in the context of ruling on a respondent's motion to dismiss an appellant's appeal as untimely taken, ruled TOLL (and nicely explained the difference between a "toll" and a… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:59 am
These eleven Appellate Term, Second Department, New York no-fault decisions were decided on March 10 and posted on March 18, 2010. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:26 pm by Law Lady
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. 1st District.Knowing when to concede error is vital:Appeals -- Sanctions -- Maintaining frivolous defense to appealM.B., Appellant, vs. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am by Neil Wilkof
Reference was made to various cases, including Morison v Moat (1861) 68 ER 492, where Turner VC held that “the Court fastens the obligation on the conscience of the party, and enforces it against him”, and Smith Kline & French Laboratories v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 17 IPR 545, where Gummow J stated that “an obligation of conscience is to respect the confidence, not merely to refrain from causing… [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:05 pm by Dan Bushell
Department of Health and Human Services, you'll notice that although the state Attorneys General succeeded in having the Health Care Act’s individual mandate declared unconstitutional, it wasn’t their arguments that ruled the day. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:17 am
Term, 2nd Dept., decided 10/9/2008)Somethings old, something new in this decision.In affirming that part of the Nassau District Court's granting plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment on its first cause of action (assignee Atwater's bills), the Appellate Term held that a no-fault insurer must accept a completed hospital facility form (NF-5) submitted by a provider of health services with respect to the claim of that provider in lieu… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am by Rosalind English
The Northern Irish Minister for Health is responsible for providing such services in NI. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust was heard on 7 June 2018. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
To deny Anonymous' request for a post-termination hearing was constitutionally infirm and, therefore, remittal of this matter is necessary for the completion of such administrative proceedings,” citing House v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 262 AD2d 929.* Although the phrase used in the decision is "be discharged from his position," such termination is not a pejorative dismissal as §73, in pertinent part, specifically provides that an… [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm by stevemehta
” This is a dramatic ruling for the Elder Abuse Litigation community because it can potentially eliminate or drastically absolve many health care providers such as physicians, home health care agencies, and other health care providers who have limited or no custodial obligations. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 10:48 am by Andrew Hamm
The Title X Family Planning Program provides grants to support health services, including cancer screening and pregnancy counseling. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Puig v New York State Police 2023 NY Slip Op 00258 Decided on January 19, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Puig v New York State Police 2023 NY Slip Op 00258 Decided on January 19, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Cortland County Department of Social Services, 186 AD2d 908 [3d Dept 1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 706 [1993]). [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 9:22 am by Giles Peaker
The report had called for the need for an updated educational health care plan to be provided but had incorrectly placed that burden on the Appellant, whereas there was a statutory duty on the Respondent to maintain and review such a plan. [read post]